Pearl - Aluminum Toe is rated out of 5 by 47.
Pearl - Aluminum Toe
Mujeres Negro + Azul, Estilo# 72491
Description and features:
El Pearl AT es uno de los zapatos de seguridad para mujer más cómodos que puede elegir y tiene una punta de seguridad de aluminio que cumple con las normas ASTM F-2413 con una clasificación de clase 75 y protección contra riesgos eléctricos (EH). Otros elementos de comodidad y seguridad incluyen una suela antideslizante y resistente a obstrucciones, parte superior resistente a derrames y plantilla removible. En negro y azul.
- Resistente al agua: Treated to repel liquids from the surface.
- Coussin additionnel:
- Ajuste natural: A default fit for most sizes of feet.
- PROTECTION CONTRE LES RISQUES ÉLECTRIQUES (RÉ):
- Punta de aluminio: Aluminum toe meets ASTM F-2413 standards bearing a class 75 rating.
- TripGuard (Protección contra tropiezos): Decreased trip hazard zone to allow fluid movement between slippery environments.
- Suela flexible: Groove pattern on the outsole that provides comfort by mimicking the foot's natural movement.
- Resistente a obstrucciones: Wider spaced traction lugs don’t let dirt and debris get stuck in the outsole.
- El collar y la lengueta acolchonados
- Punta de aluminio
- Resistentes al agua
- Suela superior antideslizante y resistente a obstrucciones con protección contra tropiezos TripGuard de SFC
- Parte superior de cuero con plantilla removible
- Liviano con acolchado adicional
- Peso (por zapato): 12.49 oz
Rated 3 out of 5 by Anonymous from I purchased these shoes because of the anti-slip qualities. I work in Animal Care where I am on my feet for 10-15 hours a day and I deal with wet floors. These shoes are amazing. They are comfortable even though I typically wear wide width shoes, these shoes feel wide enough. Unfortunately with wearing them for a few weeks, they are starting to wear out. The purple line around the shoe is coming off. The bottom black tread is also starting to peel away. Not sure if this is all related to how much I wear the shoes, but I am disappointed with the fact that they are not holding up.
Date published: 2018-03-11
Rated 4 out of 5 by Jackeline Z. from This is the first pair I have bought from SFC. I was happy with the quality while it lasted its first four-months, after that it started wearing down fast until I couldn't stand to wear them anymore because they had become unglued and had tears, by then they were six-months old. In the past, I have bought other shoes from other companies at the same price that have lasted me a year, and not just six-months, so when I saw an e-mail asking "Is it time to upgrade or replace those old shoes?" I felt frustrated because I had expected them to last longer but apparently the company didn't expected that at all. Also, in the link that directs you to reorder the same pair there's not even a discount for purchasing the same pair again.
Date published: 2018-03-08
Rated 5 out of 5 by Cynthia P. from This is the 2nd time I'm ordering this same shoe. I love them. I especially love the open weave design of the sole.Every other non-slip sole I've ever had always traps food in the grooves & if I don't remove it- it ends up smelling like something died. But not with these shoes. It's very rare I have to clean these soles out. I've also had water & oil pored on them and my feet stayed dry! I wanted to try a clog style this time, but I think I'll stick with what has been working for me. Why fix what ain't broke!
Date published: 2018-06-16
Rated 5 out of 5 by Betsy a. B. from These shoes are very comfortable. From the first time you put them on they feel great. They do tend to run big. I had already figured this and gone down a half size, but I could have gone another half. I take up the slack with some cheap insoles. I don't believe they have any arch support at all, but I have my orthotics so this was not an issue for me. I think all of the shoes on this site are wonderful.
Date published: 2018-01-05
Rated 1 out of 5 by Mary11211994 from Not for people with high arches I purchased these shoes from my employer through the Sfc catalogue. I work in a grocerystore And today was opening day. As you would expect we were very busy. Today was my first day wearing them I know you have to give them time to break in however that’s not going to help the bottom cushion. I was on my feet for five and a half hours and my feet were absolutely screaming, one of the downfalls of halving high arches. They also don’t allow for your feet to breath so my feet were very sweaty, something that doesn’t really happen to me. They are so uncomfortable I’m dreading tomorrow, I’m hoping they will still have shoe covers in my store so I can wear my comfy pair of running shoes.
Date published: 2019-04-26
Rated 5 out of 5 by Anonymous from I just received my shoes today and I wore them for work today.I can say is that they are comfortable and worth the money. I am on my feet all day long and I even took my old shoes that I had with me just in case my feet needed s break, but NOPE they were good all day and all night. The only thing is I wish there was a bit more support for the arch in them. If it would not be be fore my friend that I work with I would never have found SHOES FOR CREWS. Jenny, Wisconsin
Date published: 2018-03-03
Rated 5 out of 5 by Barbara R. from I had already purchased these in black (twice) because we are required to wear black slip resistant shoes at work. I found myself wearing them outside of work because they are so comfortable. So, I ordered the gray/purple pair to wear casually. I love them. They look good, feel good, and I get compliments on them. While wearing the black ones at work, I have never had any issues of discomfort. Most comfortable work shoes ever!
Date published: 2018-08-26
Rated 4 out of 5 by Jodi R. from Pleased with the purchase of my shoes, especially for the price. I was hoping they wouldn’t disappoint me, and I was not let down. They also do not look clunky, which was what I was hoping for too. They look at close to a running shoe as possible. Overall, not the BEST work shoes I’ve owned, but very pleased.
Date published: 2017-10-06