Radium is rated
out of
5 by
95.
Rated 5 out of
5
by
KMCD from
Buying my second pair now!
As long as you're willing to sacrifice some style points for practicality, these could be your new favorite work shoe! I have wide feet and typically buy wide shoes, but these are perfect, not too wide for me but I could see someone with narrow or even pretty standard width feet thinking they feel loose. Tried with my go to insoles at first and actually preferred the one in the shoe. Two of my coworkers have purchased and loved them too! Feet stay dry and ventilated for the most part, but the only functional downside is that feet can definitely get wet if you mop or squeegee floors, but considering it's a clog that makes sense, so just watch the splash!
Date published: 2020-06-08
Rated 2 out of
5
by
BkJones from
Could be better
Such a big difference between Bloodstone and radium. Bloodstone has all the padding you want. But your foot sits so high that twisting you ankle is a definite. Its was too understable as a shoe. So i went with the radiums....they were flat and hard. No ankle turning though. Not near the arch and heel support of bloodstone. If you make a lower profile bloodstone with good arch support, you would have an amazing shoe for chefs/cooks. (10 to 15 hour days)
Date published: 2019-05-12
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Nighthamer from
Best pair of clogs I have owned
So I kept continuously buying either Walmart clogs or I would go to a shoe store and pick up a pair of non slips for 40 or 50 dollars. They would never last more then 4 to 6 months and my feet always hurt. I decided to go with shoes for crews clogs. I will never go with any other pair of kitchen shoe again. These are the best clogs I have ever owned. My feet never hurt, they don’t slip, and they have not fallen apart yet. Highly recommend these shoes.
Date published: 2019-04-14
Rated 5 out of
5
by
MommaDee from
Comfy, even for wide feet!
I wear orthotics, and tried these shoes without them. They were OK for a while (2 hours), but the cushioned footbed isn't adequate to give me adequate arch support. With orthotics under the thick footbed? Excellent -- comfort and cushioning! I have a high instep as well as needing orthotics to keep my arches up. Still fit fine -- tight but not awful. Men's size 8 for adequate width (I wear this size normally). Now we will see how well they last!
Date published: 2019-02-03
Rated 5 out of
5
by
aowens16 from
Love Love Love!
Back in April 2016 I started working at a restaurant and originally bought shoes from Walmart. They didn't last 3 months before they ripped down the side. A server recommended these "clogs" to me and they are the most comfortable shoes you'll ever wear! Its now June of 2019 and I'm just now buying a new pair of shoes. They last a very long time, very durable for everyday use, and they're comfortable as well.
Date published: 2019-06-14
Rated 2 out of
5
by
tmp125 from
would not buy again
I have worn shoes similar to this design for 10 years because of how easy they are to clean. However, this particular brand feels too tight over the top of my foot, and they are CONSTANTLY pulling my socks down as I walk. I have never had this problem before wearing these shoes. Highly annoying when you are trying to work! They are too wide to comfortably use other insoles so I was stuck with the ones they came with which are not that great. Overall not worth it.
Date published: 2019-05-03
Rated 4 out of
5
by
NOYB from
Does its job well - simple and comfortable
I made a good choice on the product. I normally take a 61/2 shoe and chose to use size 7. Also, I have a wide width and narrow heel. Tough to size without trying shoes on. These fit well and are comfortable with my socks. After about a month of wearing them on a near daily basis, no foot problems and my legs aren't tired. They are also excellent at non-skid. Plus, they clean up well.
Date published: 2019-05-08
Rated 4 out of
5
by
Lez1021 from
Comfy slip-ons
I have enjoyed this style since I started working in the food industry since 2010. The comfort is great and helps with my knees.
Date published: 2018-11-26
